CCW, Wisconsin Environmental Groups, Seek to Intervene in the WMC Lawsuit Filed Against DNR
- Group News, Media, PFAS
- June 22, 2021
Environmental and Public Health Groups Announce Legal Action to Defend Communities from Toxic Chemical Lawsuit Brought by Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce
June 14, 2021 Press Release
Midwest Environmental Advocates (MEA) filed a request to intervene in a lawsuit initiated by Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce that threatens to fundamentally undermine the Spills Lawâa bedrock environmental and public health protection that keeps Wisconsinites safe from exposure to PFAS and other hazardous substances.
The lawsuit was filed in February by Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce and Leather Rich, Inc., who are suing the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in an effort to limit the agencyâs ability to investigate environmental contamination and require responsible parties to clean up contaminated sites. MEAâs request to intervene was filed in Waukesha County Circuit Court on behalf of a group of environmental and public health advocates who are seeking to participate in the case in order to defend their interests and the interests of their members.
The group includes Citizens for a Clean Wausau, Clean Water Action Council of Northeast Wisconsin, River Alliance of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Environmental Health Network and Doug Oitzinger, a former mayor of Marinette.
âWMCâs agenda prioritizes industry profits at the expense of public health and natural resources,â said Tony Wilkin Gibart, Executive Director of Midwest Environmental Advocates. âMEA filed a motion to intervene on behalf of our clients because we refuse to sit by while WMC attempts to dismantle one of Wisconsinâs most significant environmental and public health protections.â
Doug Oitzinger, a former mayor of the City of Marinette, said, âWeâre not talking about theoretical legal arguments here. The courtâs decision will have real-world consequences. Under the Spills Law, DNR is
providing critical assistance to people in Marinette, Peshtigo, La Crosse and other communities devastated by PFAS contamination. If WMC prevails, that assistance would vanishâthe required well testing, the orders for cleanup and remediationâit would all come to a halt. No other law gives DNR the authority to address PFAS pollution.â
âThe outcome of this case could have implications for virtually every community in the state, not just those facing PFAS contaminationâ
Tom Kilian, Citizens for a Clean Wausau
âThe outcome of this case could have implications for virtually every community in the state, not just those
facing PFAS contamination,â said Tom Kilian of Citizens for a Clean Wausau. âHere in Wausau, the Spills Law has enabled us to address industrial contamination that impacts residential areas, public parks, and the Wisconsin River. Without the Spills Law, weâd have no legal recourse for holding polluters accountable. Everyday people would be forced to figure out how to deal with soil and water contamination on their own.”
âOur request to intervene in this case is about defending the legal protections that keep Wisconsin families safe,â said Beth Neary, M.D., Co-President of Wisconsin Environmental Health Network. âResponding to hazardous substance spills and cleaning up contaminated soil and groundwater is critical to protecting public health.â
Allison Werner, Executive Director of River Alliance of Wisconsin, said, âPreserving the integrity of the
Spills Law is crucial to DNRâs ability to protect Wisconsinâs rivers and lakes. WMCâs assault on the Spills Law is a significant threat to Wisconsinâs water resources, to public health, and to all the sectors of our economyâincluding tourism and agricultureâthat rely on clean water.â
âWhen it comes to regulating PFAS and other toxic chemicals, we need to move forward, not backward,â
said Dean Hoegger, President and Executive Director of Clean Water Action Council of Northeast Wisconsin. âThe idea that the Spills Law could be gutted and that we could return to a time when polluters werenât held accountable for cleaning up contaminated soil and waterâitâs unthinkable. Unfortunately, thatâs exactly whatâs at stake in this lawsuit.â